THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING
Pharma Tech Outlook | Tuesday, October 25, 2022
It is essential to understand the common compliance issues in the pharmaceutical industry to focus on those areas and avoid compliance-related investigations.
FREMONT, CA: Compliance pressures in pharma are regularly increasing. It is common for pharmaceutical startups and scale-ups to experience growing challenges as they approach market approval. However, the best time to comply with current manufacturing practices is before receiving a warning. One way to avoid such warnings is to understand the most common compliance issues in the pharmaceutical industry and focus more on those areas.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Absence of Written Procedures
One of the most significant concerns for anyone responsible for implementing, deploying, and maintaining a quality management system is effectively documenting procedures and work instructions that are easy to understand and execute. Pharma organisations should create standard operating procedures (SOPs) for production and process control. These SOPs should include drug identity, strength, quality, and purity requirements. It needs to be reviewed and approved by the operational and quality control units. In addition, organisations should document compliance with these SOPs and record, with clear justification, any operations that deviate from the SOPs.
Along with noncompliance or inadequate issues, there are numerous challenges related to management and training. Many of these concerns can be rectified with better transparency and workflows. An electronic quality management system (QMS) for pharmaceutical companies enables the quality control (QC) unit, and production leads to collaborate more effectively throughout the process, ensuring all necessary records are updated.
Clear SOPs are not just a regulatory requirement, but such strong procedures are a path to quality. Consistent practices reduce noncompliance, deviations, and ineffective data, yet this is susceptible to frequent errors. These issues include not collaborating, unclear roles and responsibilities, and difficult formats or language. Creating and maintaining SOP documents should be collaborative between the QC unit, leadership, and employees. Compiling a document at the QC unit level is insufficient, and sending it for the required signatures is. Employees should feel empowered to communicate and provide feedback.
SOPs can be vague without mentioning specific roles. Precisely defined roles and responsibilities make it easier for employees to comply with quality processes, helping the QC unit connect training activities to procedures. Moreover, SOPs should be clear, step-by-step instructions showing employees exactly how to perform a task.
Failures in Laboratory Controls
Often, pharmaceutical companies receive citations for not having scientifically sound laboratory controls. Such better laboratory controls provide accurate, trustworthy lab data. Scientifically sound lab procedures are an extensive responsibility. Procedures, raw data, and management records are essential quality-driven operation evidence. Raw data defines compliance and management, including instrument calibration, employee adherence to SOPs, and management investigation to find the primary operation cause.
Noncompliance issues are often the result of broken workflows, collaboration, and simple human errors. However, pharmaceutical industries can eliminate these common challenges with better visibility and a QMS supporting quality-driven operations.
More in News