THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING
Pharma Tech Outlook | Monday, June 24, 2024
Many biopharmaceutical businesses aim to develop new treatments. Successful organizations must constantly assess their capabilities and decide when to develop internally or partner with an external entity to grow their pipeline.
FREMONT, CA: Partnering with a contract research organization (CRO) helps simplify and streamline the clinical development process, allowing a company to allocate internal resources to mission-critical R&D. A CRO can contribute value on multiple fronts, including the provision of a qualified team with a track record of effectively completing clinical studies according to an established procedure. CROs who supply these assets ensure a fruitful and long-term engagement by providing systems and other third-party vendor contacts.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
It is crucial to begin a partnership with a CRO that is a good fit for organizations in terms of size and competencies to ensure that the collaboration is fruitful for both parties. A CRO with a track record of successful engagements with similarly sized companies has a particularly in-depth understanding of the unique difficulties faced by small biotech startups seeking to scale their growth. Additionally, the CRO must be able to deliver all required services, which are frequently bigger than those required by larger organizations with better internal resources. This degree of understanding and service is crucial for a productive and mutually beneficial partnership. Based on our aggregate expertise of over 50 years in clinical development, we propose three takeaways for small biotechs to consider when forming a collaboration with a CRO that meets their specific requirements.
CHOOSING THE APPROPRIATE CRO
This is the case for science/therapeutic areas and corporate culture, as each biotech and pharmaceutical company is unique and has various needs to supplement its internal clinical development resources. Over time, CROs have gained expertise working with different biotech and pharma companies, ranging from large and midsize pharmaceutical organizations to emerging biotech firms. Successful CROs will be able to adapt their services and approach to meet the requirements of the partnering company. Certain CROs specialize in conducting clinical trials in various geographic locales, and identifying a CRO whose regional experience aligns with clinical enrollment goals can further reduce the partnership's risk.
From the standpoint of a small biotech company, it is crucial to establish a collaboration with open and honest communication, particularly about implementation and work distribution, to avoid unpleasant shocks during the process. This involves setting clear expectations regarding which tasks will be the CRO's responsibility and which will be internal to the organization. Careful attention to job assignments will prevent the unpleasant finding of unassigned work that a small biotech company may not have the manpower to do if resources were not allocated effectively at the beginning of the project. This is especially critical for smaller biotech companies to prevent the discovery of incomplete tasks that could result in operational or quality deficiencies. Often, there is a rush to initiate a study, but problems will arise later in the project if expectations are not clearly and thoroughly specified at the outset.
Another essential part of picking a CRO that meets the demands of small biotech is ensuring that it can provide the same committed attention and solutions to the company's program(s) in other business areas. These include, but are not limited to, real-time, bidirectional communications, the capacity to execute according to plan, fast data reporting, and cost predictability. While some small biotech companies "throw the ball over the wall," others participate in each decision made during the trial and require regular communication and participation. Similarly, if a corporation has extensive involvement, the sponsor and CRO must discuss and agree to any changes to the strategy. Lastly, careful financial management is essential when changes to individual study budgets significantly impact the organization's financial picture. Larger organizations may establish operational goals for reducing change orders, whereas smaller organizations require predictability for financial runway estimates and planning. Small biotechs, whose development and costs are frequently publicized in great detail to stakeholders and the general public, can be significantly impacted by problems in such areas.
More in News